Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education
United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
220 F. Supp. 667 (1963)
- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Ralph Stell and other Black public school students (plaintiffs) filed a class-action suit, seeking to enjoin the Savanna-Chatham County Board of Education (defendant) from continuing to operate separate public schools for Black children and White children. White public school children intervened, asserting that the separate school systems were necessitated not only because of race, but because of differences in Black and White students that were of such magnitude that it was not possible for the children to learn together in the same classrooms. The White students alleged that integrating the schools would seriously impede the educational opportunities of students of both races and bring serious psychological harm. The White students presented the testimony of a professor who reviewed various studies with the district court, which suggested that integration in education increased racial hostility and disciplinary issues in classrooms. At the close of evidence, Stell and the other plaintiffs renewed a previous objection to the intervenors’ evidence as not relevant and moved to strike the evidence because this case occurred after Brown v. Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court had ruled that segregation harmed Black children. Before ruling on Stell’s objection, the federal district court assessed whether the relevant portion of Brown was a factual finding that the district court did not have to follow or a conclusion of law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scarlett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.