Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Stephens v. Attorney General of California

23 F.3d 248 (1994)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Stephens v. Attorney General of California

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

23 F.3d 248 (1994)

Facts

A detective from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) stopped Gill Stephens (defendant) while Stephens was waiting to board a Greyhound bus. The detective and his partner seized cocaine from Stephens’s bags and federally charged Stephens with possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Stephens filed a motion to suppress the cocaine, arguing that he did not consent to the search of his bags. The federal district court suppressed the cocaine. Instead of appealing from the district court’s suppression order, the United States Attorney dismissed the indictment. The same LAPD detectives then brought Stephens’s case to the Los Angeles District Attorney, who decided to bring state drug charges and prosecute Stephens in state court. Stephens again moved to suppress the cocaine, but the state court denied Stephens’s motion because it believed the LAPD detectives’ testimony that Stephens had consented to the search. Stephens pleaded guilty and then appealed, arguing that the state court had violated the doctrine of collateral estoppel by relitigating the search’s legality. After exhausting his state remedies, Stephens filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court denied Stephens’s petition, and Stephens appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership