Stephens v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
734 P.2d 555 (1987)
Roy Dale Stephens (defendant) allowed a friend, Harry Van Buren, to stay at his home one night after Van Buren informed Stephens that he had burglarized Yellowstone Electric hours earlier. Instead of informing the police or instructing Van Buren to leave, Stephens said that he “didn’t want to hear about it,” and went to bed. The following morning, Stephens and Van Buren set out to find a part for Stephens’ truck. When no part could be located, Van Buren gave Stephens $100 to help him purchase a car. Upon returning home Stephens was questioned by the police about the burglary. At first, Stephens denied having any knowledge about the crime, but later admitted that Van Buren had informed him that he had committed the act. Stephens was charged with and convicted of being an accessory after the fact to Van Buren’s burglary. Stephens appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.