Stepniewski v. Gagnon
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
732 F.2d 567 (1984)
Richard Stepniewski (petitioner) was convicted of 12 counts of home improvement trade practice violations in a Milwaukee, Wisconsin circuit court and sentenced to serve one year in prison on one of the counts plus six consecutive and five concurrent one-year sentences, stayed by probation, for the remaining counts. Due to a prior felony conviction, the court additionally imposed a six-month prison term to be served consecutively to the other sentences. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals and the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the convictions. Thereafter, Stepniewski filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court, arguing that his convictions without proof of criminal intent violated his constitutional right to due process. The court agreed and granted the writ. Gagnon appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.