Stethem v. Islamic Republic of Iran

201 F. Supp. 2d 78 (2002)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stethem v. Islamic Republic of Iran

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
201 F. Supp. 2d 78 (2002)

Facts

Robert Stethem and seven other members of the United States military (plaintiffs) were passengers on a 1985 flight from Athens to Rome. The flight was hijacked by an Iranian paramilitary group known as Hizballah. All eight military servicemembers were beaten for the next 16 hours until the aircraft landed in Beirut. There, Stethem was shot in the head, and the other seven servicemembers were turned over to Amal, a Lebanese militia group that had hired Hizballah to perform the hijacking. The seven servicemembers continued to be mentally and physically tortured, not knowing whether death was imminent or how long their captivity would last. The United States was unable to negotiate a release directly from the captors. However, when the Iranian president told the captors to release the servicemembers, which occurred approximately two weeks after the hijacking, the servicemembers were released. The servicemembers and their families (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in United States federal court against the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran) and its Ministry of Information and Security (ministry) (defendants). Evidence established that (1) Iran, through the ministry, recruited, trained, and financially supported Hizballah; (2) the United States had designated Iran a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984, a year before the incident; (3) the servicemembers and their relatives were United States citizens; (4) the servicemembers and their relatives had each suffered compensable damages ranging from $200,000 to $5 million, for a total of approximately $29 million; and (5) the ministry’s annual budget for supporting terrorism was approximately $100 million.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership