Stevens v. Arch Wood Protection, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Civil Action No. 12-46-HRW, 2006 WL 5660362 (2016)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Between 1981 and 2011, Paul Stevens worked as a pole climber and supervisor for Kentucky Power Company (Kentucky Power). As part of his job duties, Stevens came into frequent contact with wooden utility poles and sometimes fought pole fires. Kentucky Power serviced a large network. Between 1992 and 2003, Kentucky Power purchased wooden utility poles that were treated with a chemical preservative, chromated copper arsenate (CCA), from nine different suppliers. Three of the suppliers were Koppers, Inc., Langdale Forest Products Company (Langdale), and T.R. Miller Mill Company, Inc. (T.R. Miller) (collectively, the wood suppliers) (defendants). Koppers and T.R. Miller purchased CCA from Arch Wood Protection, Inc. (Arch) (defendant), while Langdale purchased CCA from both Chemical Specialties, Inc. (CSI) (defendant) and Osmose Inc. (defendant) during a certain period of time. Langdale purchased CCA almost exclusively from either CSI or Osmose for other respective periods. In 2012, Stevens died from a malignant melanoma, allegedly caused by long-term exposure to CCA. Stevens’s estate (plaintiff) filed a product-liability action against the wood suppliers, Arch, CSI, and Osmose, alleging that the companies failed to warn Stevens of the health hazards caused by exposure to CCA. Witnesses were unable to identify specific poles that Stevens had worked on. The companies asserted various defenses, many of which centered on the estate’s inability to tie Stevens’s illness to any company’s product. The companies moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilholt Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.