Stevens v. Veenstra
Michigan Court of Appeals
573 N.W.2d 341 (1998)
Aaron Veenstra (defendant), a 14-year-old, took a driver’s education class. While practicing driving with the driving instructor, Veenstra ran into James Stevens (plaintiff), causing injury. Stevens brought a negligence suit against Veenstra. The trial court instructed the jury to hold Veenstra to the standard of care for a reasonably careful minor of the same age, intelligence, and experience as Veenstra. The jury found in Veenstra’s favor. Stevens appealed, arguing that the trial court’s jury instructions were improper because a minor engaging in a dangerous adult activity, such as driving, should be charged with the adult standard of care. Veenstra argued that because he was driving during a driver’s education course, a minor-specific program, he should not be charged with the standard of care for an adult activity.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.