Stewart Capital Corp. v. Andrus

468 F. Supp. 1261 (1979)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stewart Capital Corp. v. Andrus

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
468 F. Supp. 1261 (1979)

Facts

Stewart Capital Corporation (SCC) (plaintiff), a Delaware corporation, submitted a bid to the Department of the Interior (the department) for an offshore oil-and-gas lease. Cecil Andrus (defendant), as the secretary of interior, reviewed the bids to decide on the department’s behalf. The notice for the bids required all bids to be submitted in accordance with applicable regulations. Additionally, the notice set forth the form of the bid, including specific signature requirements that did not include an attestation to the bid. Further, the department required each bidder to submit a check for a portion of the bid, as well as a copy of the corporate documents authorizing the person signing the bid to do so on the corporation’s behalf with an appropriate attestation by the corporate secretary or assistant secretary. Although SCC’s president signed the bid, the signature was not attested to by SCC’s corporate secretary or assistant secretary. However, SCC’s assistant secretary attested to the check submitted with the bid and the corporate documents authorizing SCC’s president and assistant secretary to respectively execute and attest to the necessary documents to make the bid. SCC submitted the highest bid. Notwithstanding, Andrus accepted a lower bid on the ground that the omission of a formal attestation accompanying the president’s signature on SCC’s bid purportedly invalidated the bid. Accordingly, SCC sued Andrus and sought a declaratory judgment and an injunction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pollack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership