Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.
United States Supreme Court
543 U.S. 481, 125 S.Ct. 118, 160 L.Ed.2d 932, 2005 AMC 609 (2005)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Willard Stewart (plaintiff) was a marine engineer on the Super Scoop, the world’s largest maritime dredge. The Super Scoop was owned by Dutra Construction Co. (Dutra) (defendant) and was operating in Boston Harbor on Boston’s “Big Dig” project, constructing a massive transportation tunnel running beneath the city and the harbor. The dredge was a floating platform with a giant bucket that removed sand from the waterway floor. During the Big Dig, the Super Scoop moved itself, its equipment, and its crew slowly across the harbor as it dredged the trench for the tunnel. Stewart was seriously injured on a barge adjacent to the Super Scoop when the dredge hit the barge and jolted it, causing him to fall headfirst through a hatch. The dredge was not underway at the time of the accident. Stewart sued Dutra in federal court under the Jones Act, alleging that he was a seaman injured by his employer’s negligence. Dutra moved for summary judgment, claiming that Stewart could not be considered a seaman because the Super Scoop was not a vessel for purposed of the Jones Act. The district court granted summary judgment to Dutra. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, and Stewart appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.