Stewart v. Western Heritage Insurance Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
438 F.3d 488 (2006)
- Written by Marissa Richardson , JD
Facts
Boardwalk Lounge, Inc. (Boardwalk) was previously sued for a patron’s wrongful death. Susie Pierce Stewart (plaintiff) was Boardwalk’s sole shareholder, officer, and registered agent, and Western Heritage Insurance Company (Western) (defendant) was Boardwalk’s insurer. Ultimately, default judgment was entered against Boardwalk in the action. Western denied having any obligation to defend or indemnify Boardwalk. Boardwalk and Stewart filed for bankruptcy. On October 23, 2003, Stewart filed this action against Western in a Mississippi federal district court, claiming breach of insurance contract and bad faith. The district court entered a case-management order, Western moved for summary judgment, and a trial date was set. On July 6, 2004, the bankruptcy trustee for Boardwalk filed a Mississippi state court action against Stewart and Western. The trustee’s complaint mirrored the federal complaint except for some additional claims. Western removed the action to federal court, and the trustee moved to remand. At a hearing in February 2005, the court stayed this action pending a ruling on the trustee’s motion to remand. On March 22, the trustee’s remand motion was granted. On March 31, the district court entered an order sua sponte, terminating all pending motions and staying this federal action until the trustee’s state court action was resolved. Western appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Benavides, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.