Stewart v. Wilkie

30 Vet. App. 383 (2018)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stewart v. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
30 Vet. App. 383 (2018)

Facts

Eric J. Stewart (plaintiff) served in the US Army, and while in Iraq, Steward was exposed to sand, dust, and smoke from burning garbage. After discharge, Stewart was diagnosed with asthma. Stewart filed a disability-compensation claim for a medically unexplained chronic multisymptom illness (MUCMI). A pulmonary-function test showed that Stewart had obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disease. Based on the prior diagnosis of asthma, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) examiner issued an opinion that Stewart did not have obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disease and that his test results and symptoms were all from his asthma. The Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board) found that asthma was not a MUCMI and denied Stewart’s claim based on the reasoning that the etiology of asthma was partially understood, so it could not be a MUCMI. Stewart appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pietsch, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Schoelen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership