Stewart v. Wilkie
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
30 Vet. App. 383 (2018)

- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Eric J. Stewart (plaintiff) served in the US Army, and while in Iraq, Steward was exposed to sand, dust, and smoke from burning garbage. After discharge, Stewart was diagnosed with asthma. Stewart filed a disability-compensation claim for a medically unexplained chronic multisymptom illness (MUCMI). A pulmonary-function test showed that Stewart had obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disease. Based on the prior diagnosis of asthma, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) examiner issued an opinion that Stewart did not have obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disease and that his test results and symptoms were all from his asthma. The Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board) found that asthma was not a MUCMI and denied Stewart’s claim based on the reasoning that the etiology of asthma was partially understood, so it could not be a MUCMI. Stewart appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pietsch, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Schoelen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.