Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Stitz v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

650 F. Supp. 914 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stitz v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
650 F. Supp. 914 (1987)

SC

Facts

George Levasseur was an attorney for Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem) (defendant). As part of his job with Bethlehem, Levasseur practiced employment law, focusing on hourly and salaried nonexempt employees. After nine years, Levasseur left Bethlehem and started working at a private law firm. Walter Stitz (plaintiff), an employee at Bethlehem, hired Levasseur to represent him in an age-discrimination case against Bethlehem. Stitz was a salaried exempt employee at Bethlehem. Bethlehem filed a motion to disqualify Levasseur on the ground that he was privy to confidential Bethlehem personnel policies and procedures due to his previous work for the company as a labor attorney. Levasseur argued that his work at Bethlehem involved hourly and salaried nonexempt employees, not a salaried exempt employee like Stitz.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legal Ethics

Key Terms