Stone Hedge Properties v. Phoenix Capital Corp. (In re Stone Hedge Properties)

191 B.R. 59 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stone Hedge Properties v. Phoenix Capital Corp. (In re Stone Hedge Properties)

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
191 B.R. 59 (1995)

Facts

Stone Hedge Properties (debtor) obtained a mortgage from PNC Bank to finance the construction of a golf course. The mortgage was secured by collateral including the golf course, the golf course’s equipment, and a nearby housing development. Stone Hedge and PNC subsequently restructured the debt, but Stone Hedge could not make regular payments after the restructuring and filed a chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. The schedules filed with the petition listed PNC’s claim as undisputed, liquidated, and noncontingent. PNC then sold the mortgage to Phoenix Capital Corporation (creditor), a company run by former employees of the PNC subsidiary that had been servicing the mortgage. Although the balance due on the mortgage was $2,350,000, Phoenix paid PNC only $1,315,000. Phoenix then filed a proof of claim for $2,592,789.36 in the bankruptcy proceeding, which represented the face amount of the mortgage plus interest, fees, and costs. Phoenix also asserted that the collateral securing the debt was worth $2,080,000, which meant that part of Phoenix’s debt was unsecured. Stone Hedge objected to Phoenix’s claim, arguing that it would be inequitable to allow Phoenix to profit on the mortgage when Phoenix’s principals might have had insider information from their previous employment. Stone Hedge further argued that if the claim were allowed, it should be limited to the $1,315,000 Phoenix paid for the mortgage. Stone Hedge also disputed Phoenix’s valuation, asserting that the collateral was worth at least $4.5 million. Stone Hedge and Phoenix gave the court separate proposed plans for Stone Hedge’s reorganization. Both parties’ plans treated Phoenix as a fully secured creditor whose claim would eventually be allowed. Phoenix asked the court to temporarily allow its claim under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3018 so that Phoenix could vote on Stone Hedge’s reorganization plan. Phoenix also asked the court to value the collateral. Appraisers testified that the collateral was worth $2,567,000.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership