Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Stonecipher v. Pillatsch

Illinois Appellate Court
332 N.E.2d 151 (1975)


Facts

Richard and Audrey Stonecipher (plaintiffs) entered a contract to buy a house from Arnold and Elleen Pillatsch (defendants), and the Stoneciphers gave the Pillatsches a $1,000 deposit. The contract provided that the Stoneciphers would take possession of the house on July 1. In early June, however, the Pillatsches contacted the Stoneciphers about pushing back the possession date. The Stoneciphers orally agreed to push the date back to July 15. Soon afterward, the Stoneciphers became aware that the Pillatsches actually wanted to move out on August 1. The Stoneciphers then told the Pillatsches that the Stoneciphers would be holding them to the original July 1 possession date. The Pillatsches said that they could not move out until August 1. The Stoneciphers replied by saying the contract was off and demanding their $1,000 deposit back. The Pillatsches refused. On June 16, the Pillatsches sent the Stoneciphers a letter saying they would be out by July 1. The Stoneciphers did not respond until filing suit against the Pillatsches on August 31. The trial court ruled for the Stoneciphers and ordered the Pillatsches to give back the $1,000 deposit. The Pillatsches appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Seidenfeld, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.