Storke v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
61 N.E.2d 552 (1945)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Storke and his partner, Timmerman, owned 40 acres of land in an area that would eventually become part of Chicago. In 1889 Storke and Timmerman divided the land into lots and began selling them. The deeds transferring the lots included provisions that attempted to prevent any saloon being operated or liquor being sold on the lots in the future. The deeds asserted that if those prohibited conditions occurred, the land would revert back to Storke and Timmerman or their heirs. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. (Penn Mutual) (defendant) acquired title to one of the lots in 1934 and rented the property to a person who operated a tavern there. By that time, a number of other establishments that sold alcohol were operating on lots that had originally been transferred by Storke and Timmerman. Storke’s heirs (plaintiffs) filed a suit against Penn Mutual that attempted to assert title to the lot for themselves and Timmerman’s unknown heirs based upon the restrictive provisions in the original deed. The lower court confirmed title for Penn Mutual.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gunn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.