Storm LLC v. Telenor Mobile Communications
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90978 (2006)

- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
Norwegian company Telenor Mobile Communications AS (Telenor) (plaintiff) and Ukrainian company Storm LLC (defendant) owned Ukrainian company Kyivstar G.S.M. Storm was a holding company owning 40 percent of Kyivstar. Altimo Holdings Investment Ltd. (Altimo), formerly Alpha Telecommunications, owned 50.1 percent of Storm through related company Alpren Ltd. Kyivstar’s shareholder agreement included an arbitration provision requiring that disputes be arbitrated in New York. Telenor initiated arbitration, alleging that Storm violated the shareholder agreement by failing to follow Kyivstar’s governance procedures. During arbitration, Alpren, 49 percent owner of Storm, brought suit against Storm in Ukraine, arguing that the shareholder agreement was unenforceable. Vadim Klymenko, vice president of Altimo, appeared on behalf of Storm and countered Alpren’s claims. The Ukraine court found that the shareholder agreement was invalid, and Storm appealed. The ruling was affirmed, invalidating the shareholder agreement and arbitration provision. Storm moved to dismiss the arbitration, which the arbitrator denied. Storm filed suit in state court, later removed to federal district court, opposing the arbitration based on subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court declined to review Storm’s lawsuit involving an interlocutory arbitration order because the Ukraine court did not order that Storm could not participate in arbitration. Alpren brought suit in Ukraine against Storm and Klymenko. The Ukraine court ruled that Klymenko, Storm, and Telenor were precluded from arbitrating. Telenor filed suit in district court, requesting that Storm be compelled to arbitrate, and sought an antisuit injunction preventing litigation in Ukraine.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.