Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Stowell v. Cloquet Co-op Credit Union

Supreme Court of Minnesota
557 N.W.2d 567 (1997)


Facts

Cloquet Credit Union (Credit Union) (defendant) operated an automatic check-processing system used throughout the banking industry. Credit Union sent to its customers monthly bank statements listing each account transaction, relying on customer notification to identify potential fraud or error. Randall Stowell (plaintiff) opened an account with Credit Union, at which time he signed a Draft Withdrawal Agreement (Agreement) informing him that, if he did not object within 20 days from the date of mailing, the statement would be considered accurate and final. A few years later, Robert Nelson moved into a home near Stowell. Over a one-year period, Nelson stole approximately 50 checks from Stowell’s mailbox, forged Stowell’s signature, and cashed the checks. Nelson also took Stowell’s monthly account statements. Stowell repeatedly contacted Credit Union, which sent duplicate statements that Stowell never received. Stowell eventually discovered the forgeries when he received notification that a check written from his account had bounced. Stowell and Credit Union reviewed the statements and found that Nelson had forged checks totaling more than $22,000. Stowell brought suit against Credit Union, demanding reimbursement. A jury found in favor of Stowell, and the court of appeals affirmed. Credit Union appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stringer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.