From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.
Supreme Court of New Mexico
916 P.2d 822 (N.M. 1996)
Strata Production Company (Strata) (plaintiff) compiled a drilling prospect on three tracts of land, which were together known as the Red Tank Prospect. Strata signed farmout agreements with oil and gas lessees on each of the three tracts, including Mercury Exploration Company (Mercury) (defendant). Strata and Mercury entered into a farmout agreement on August 28, 1991. Mercury represented in the agreement that Mercury owned 100 percent of the working interest in its lease. The agreement provided that Mercury’s working interest would be assigned to Strata upon Strata’s drilling of a test well on the tract within 120 days. The agreement was at Strata’s option, as there would be no penalty if Strata did not drill the well. Strata paid no consideration for the option. On October 29, 1991, in furtherance of the Red Tank Prospect, Strata drilled a well on one of the other three tracts. On November 10, 1991, Strata discovered that Mercury did not own 100 percent of the working interest in the Mercury lease. On January 10, 1992, Strata began drilling a well on the Mercury tract, thus performing under the farmout agreement with Mercury. Strata brought suit against Mercury for breach of contract based on Mercury’s inability to assign 100 percent of the working interest. The trial court found in favor of Strata. Mercury appealed, arguing that the farmout agreement was a unilateral contract that Mercury was free to modify at any time. Mercury claimed that Strata’s discovery of the title discrepancy effectively modified the terms of the agreement.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Frost, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.