Stringer v. National Football League

749 F. Supp. 2d 680 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stringer v. National Football League

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
749 F. Supp. 2d 680 (2010)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

Korey Stringer, a National Football League (NFL) player for the Minnesota Vikings, died during the Vikings’ summer training camp. Stringer typically showed up to the camp out-of-shape; he weighed 340 pounds and was not acclimated to exercising in the heat. Practice began on July 30, and it was extremely hot and humid. The players wore shorts and protective gear consisting of helmets and shoulder pads. During the afternoon practice, Stringer suffered an episode of heat exhaustion, had stomach pain, was vomiting, and was involuntarily removed from practice. On the second day, instead of shorts, the players wore football pants with knee, thigh, and hip pads, along with helmets and shoulder pads. Stringer collapsed on the practice field and was taken to the hospital, where he later died due to multi-organ failure and complications from exertional heat stroke. Kelci Stringer (plaintiff), Stringer’s wife and estate executor, filed a products-liability action against the All American Sports Corporation and Riddell, Inc. (collectively, Riddell) (defendants), the manufacturers of the helmets, shoulder pads, and football pants, alleging, among other things, that a design defect caused Stringer’s death. The complaint alleged that the protective gear acted as an insulating blanket preventing evaporation and heat dissipation, unreasonably increasing Stringer’s body temperature. No evidence of an alternative, feasible design was presented, and although some evidence that other helmets included air vents was presented, Riddell presented evidence that the vented helmets were no cooler. Riddell filed for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holschuh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership