Strino v. Premier Healthcare, P.C.

850 N.E.2d 221 (2006)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Strino v. Premier Healthcare, P.C.

Illinois Appellate Court
850 N.E.2d 221 (2006)

SC

Facts

The son of Maria and Frank Strino (plaintiffs) died when he was 20 months old. The Strinos sued James Lindemulder (defendant), the doctor who delivered their son, alleging negligent care of their son. At Lindemulder’s deposition, Lindemulder testified that Frank had told him in the hospital room that if he used forceps on Maria, Frank would sue him. At trial, Lindemulder testified that Frank had told him in the hospital room that if he used forceps on Maria, Frank would kick his ass. On cross-examination, the Strinos asked Lindemulder if, in the deposition, Lindemulder had mentioned Frank’s statement about kicking his ass. Lindemulder responded that he did not mention that statement in the deposition. At that point, Lindemulder objected to any further questioning on the ground that there was no inconsistency between Lindemulder’s deposition and his trial testimony. The court sustained the objection. The jury returned a verdict for Lindemulder. The Strinos appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McNulty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership