Strong v. Sheffield
Court of Appeals of New York
144 N.Y. 392, 39 N.E. 330 (1895)
- Written by Christine Hilgeman, JD
Facts
Benjamin Strong (Strong) (plaintiff) sold a business on credit to Gerardus Sheffield (Gerardus), husband of Louisa Sheffield (Louisa) (defendant). Strong and Gerardus memorialized the debt in a promissory note that was payable on demand. Later, Louisa endorsed the note, per Strong’s request. Strong later brought an action against Louisa for payment on the promissory note. The question before the trial court was whether there was consideration for Louisa’s agreement to be responsible for Gerardus’ debt. Strong testified that he had promised to hold the note and not sell it or collect on it until he decided that he wanted the money, provided that Louisa endorsed it. Strong then held the note for two years before demanding payment. The trial court ruled in favor of Strong. The General Term reversed the trial court on an initial appeal by Louisa, and Strong appealed that reversal to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Andrews, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
