Strouth v. Pools by Murphy and Sons, Inc.
Appellate Court of Connecticut
829 A.2d 102 (2003)

- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
The Strouths (plaintiffs) sought to have Pools by Murphy and Sons, Inc. (Pools by Murphy) (defendant) install a swimming pool in their yard. The Strouths selected a peanut-shaped pool with a circular spa from a brochure and informed Pools by Murphy of its decision. The parties entered a contract specifying that Pools by Murphy would construct a “custom” shaped pool for the Strouths. Construction commenced and Pools by Murphy excavated the yard and built a steel frame. However, the frame was in the shape of a kidney with an almond-shaped spa. The Strouths ordered Pools by Murphy to discontinue construction. Pools by Murphy eventually offered to complete construction of the kidney-shaped pool with a circular spa. The Strouths refused and brought suit against Pools by Murphy for breach of contract. The trial court found that Pools by Murphy substantially deviated from the requirements of the contract. It held that construction of the kidney-shaped pool was a material breach of the contract and awarded the Strouths $10,618.63. Pools by Murphy appealed, arguing that the trial court improperly found that construction of a kidney-shaped pool was a material breach of the contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lavery, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.