Structural Dynamics Research Corp. v. Engineering Mechanics Research Corp.

401 F. Supp. 1102 (1975)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Structural Dynamics Research Corp. v. Engineering Mechanics Research Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
401 F. Supp. 1102 (1975)

Facts

In the field of structural analysis, computer models were generally limited to straight-sided elements. This gave rise to interest in a program that could incorporate curved and irregularly shaped structures, which were known in the field as isoparametric elements. Karan Surana (defendant) and Kant Kothawala (defendant), employees of Ohio-based Structural Dynamics Research Corporation (SDRC) (plaintiff), successfully developed a computer program incorporating isoparametric elements. Surana and Kothawala entered into employee-patent and confidential-information agreements with SDRC. Surana and Kothawala later ended their employment with SDRC and began working with the same programs for Michigan-based Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation (EMRC) (defendant). SDRC brought suit against EMRC; Surana; Kothawala; and another former employee, Robert Hildebrand (defendant), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan under diversity jurisdiction. SDRC alleged unfair competition, trade-secret misappropriation, and breach of contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feikens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership