Structural Dynamics Research Corp. v. Engineering Mechanics Research Corp.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
401 F. Supp. 1102 (1975)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
In the field of structural analysis, computer models were generally limited to straight-sided elements. This gave rise to interest in a program that could incorporate curved and irregularly shaped structures, which were known in the field as isoparametric elements. Karan Surana (defendant) and Kant Kothawala (defendant), employees of Ohio-based Structural Dynamics Research Corporation (SDRC) (plaintiff), successfully developed a computer program incorporating isoparametric elements. Surana and Kothawala entered into employee-patent and confidential-information agreements with SDRC. Surana and Kothawala later ended their employment with SDRC and began working with the same programs for Michigan-based Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation (EMRC) (defendant). SDRC brought suit against EMRC; Surana; Kothawala; and another former employee, Robert Hildebrand (defendant), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan under diversity jurisdiction. SDRC alleged unfair competition, trade-secret misappropriation, and breach of contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Feikens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.