Structural Polymer Group, Ltd. v. Zoltek Corp.

543 F.3d 987 (2008)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Structural Polymer Group, Ltd. v. Zoltek Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
543 F.3d 987 (2008)

Play video

Facts

Structural Polymer Group, Ltd. and Structural Polymer Systems (SP) (plaintiffs) manufactured a building material called “prepreg” using carbon fiber. Zoltek Corporation (Zoltek) (defendant) entered a ten-year requirements contract to supply SP’s carbon fiber. SP had no requirements at the time. The agreement covered a large-tow carbon fiber product called Panex 33, which is lower cost and quality than small-tow carbon fiber. The contract gave SP the option to buy from different suppliers if Zoltek could not meet lower prices. In 2002, Zoltek stopped making Panex 33 and started making a similar product called Panex 35. SP did not buy any carbon fiber for two years, but did order Panex 35 in 2004. Later, SP ordered two shipments of Panex 35 that were never filled. SP sued Zoltek for breach. At trial, the parties disputed whether SP was entitled to both Panex 33 and Panex 35. SP offered alternative damage calculations based on each product. The jury awarded SP lost profits based on SP’s calculations for damages using both Panex 33 and Panex 35 but declined to award future lost profits. The district court reduced the duplicative damage award. Zoltek moved for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law, which were denied. SP appealed the damage reduction, and Zoltek appealed the denial of its motions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Colloton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms