Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Stuart v. Huff

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
706 F.3d 345 (4th Cir. 2013)


Facts

A North Carolina statute required a physician or qualified technician to provide to a woman seeking an abortion a real-time ultrasound display of the fetus and a concurrent explanation of what the display depicted. Gretchen Stuart, M.D., individually and on behalf of her patients seeking abortions (plaintiffs), filed suit in federal district court against Janice Huff, the president of the North Carolina Medical Board; North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper; and others (defendants), challenging the constitutionality of the statute. The plaintiffs sought a declaration striking down the statute as violative of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, an injunction preventing enforcement of the law, and a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The district court issued a preliminary injunction halting the real-time display and explanation requirements, but upheld the remainder of the law. Instead of appealing the ruling, Cooper answered the plaintiffs’ complaint and thereafter filed a motion to dismiss the suit. A group consisting of pro-life medical professionals, women who had undergone abortion procedures, and pregnancy-counseling centers (intervenors) (defendants) filed a motion to intervene as defendants as a matter of right pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 24(a), and alternatively as a permissive matter pursuant to FRCP 24(b). The district court denied both motions. The intervenors appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.