Stud v. Trans International Airlines
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
727 F.2d 880 (1984)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Nevelle Stud (plaintiff) contracted with Transamerica Airlines (Transamerica) (defendant) to ship Stud’s $300,000 horse from Canada to New Zealand. The horse arrived in New Zealand in seemingly good health. However, the horse then became ill and died 10 days after arriving in New Zealand. Two months later, a final autopsy report was issued, and it indicated that the horse had likely died from a respiratory illness caused by fluctuating cabin temperatures during the flight. After receiving the autopsy report, Stud made a written complaint to Transamerica, claiming that it had damaged the horse. Transamerica disputed the claim, and Stud brought a Warsaw Convention claim against Transamerica in California federal court for the loss. Transamerica moved for summary judgment, arguing that Stud’s claim was barred because Stud had not made a written complaint about the damage within 14 days, as required by the Warsaw Convention. Stud responded that written notice had been unnecessary because the press coverage that had surrounded the horse’s death had given Transamerica timely, actual notice of the damage. The district court granted Transamerica’s motion and dismissed Stud’s claim. Stud appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goodwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.