Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Stuparich v. Harbor Furniture Mfg., Inc.

California Court of Appeal
83 Cal.App.4th 1268 (2000)


Facts

Ann Stuparich and Candi Tuttleton (plaintiffs) were sisters who each owned 19.05 percent of the voting and one-third of the non-voting shares in Harbor Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. (Harbor Furniture). Their brother, Malcolm, owned 51.56 percent of the voting shares. The plaintiffs became generally frustrated with the management of the corporation, including the failure to observe corporate formalities. The corporation had two operations, a mobile home park and its original furniture manufacturing operation. The furniture manufacturing operation had become unsuccessful, incurring losses, while the mobile home park was very profitable. The plaintiffs proposed formally separating the operations to insulate the profits of the mobile home park. Malcolm refused to discuss the proposal and later refused the plaintiffs’ request to buy them out. At that point, the plaintiffs became so frustrated that they stopped attending annual meetings. Throughout this time period, the plaintiffs continued to receive monthly dividends from the corporation. Nonetheless, they brought suit, seeking involuntary dissolution of the corporation. Harbor Furniture moved for summary judgment and the motion was granted. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Epstein, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.