Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Suburban Leisure Center, Inc. v. AMF Bowling Products, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
468 F.3d 523 (2006)


Facts

Suburban Leisure Center, Inc. (Suburban) (plaintiff) distributes lawn and leisure equipment. AMF Bowling Products, Inc. (AMF) (defendant) manufactures pool tables and pool table supplies. Suburban and AMF entered an oral franchise agreement giving Suburban the right to use AMF’s trade name, trademark, and service mark to sell AMF’s products in Suburban’s stores. Suburban and AMF later entered a separate written e-commerce agreement in which Suburban agreed to deliver and install AMF’s products for AMF’s customers near Suburban. The e-commerce agreement contained an arbitration clause providing that all disputes between Suburban and AMF would be subject to binding arbitration in Richmond, Virginia. The e-commerce agreement also contained a merger clause which stated that the e-commerce agreement constituted the entire agreement between the parties and superseded all prior agreements. Finally, the e-commerce agreement stated that commerce between Suburban and AMF would be governed by Virginia law. On August 25, 2005, AMF sent a letter to Suburban terminating the oral franchise agreement and requiring Suburban to cease promoting AMF’s line of pool tables in its stores within sixty days. Suburban filed suit in Missouri state court seeking damages from cancellation of the oral franchise agreement. AMF removed the matter to federal court. AMF filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause in its e-commerce agreement with Suburban. The district court denied AMF’s motion to compel arbitration, and AMF appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Shepherd, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.