Suen Toi Lee v. Yau Yee Ping

[2001] 4 H.K.C.F.A.R. 474 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Suen Toi Lee v. Yau Yee Ping

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal
[2001] 4 H.K.C.F.A.R. 474 (2001)

Facts

In Hong Kong, men of Chinese ethnicity were permitted to take concubines as part of Chinese customary marriage, known in other jurisdictions as common-law marriage. A concubinage was established if three elements were satisfied: (1) a man intended to take a woman into his household as his concubine and publicly held her out as such; (2) the woman consented to be the man’s concubine and, if the man was married, agreed to hold a lower position than that of the man’s wife; and (3) if the man was married, his wife agreed to the concubinage. A concubine occupied a legally recognized position between that of a mistress and a wife and had the right to her consort’s financial maintenance during his life and from his estate after his death. Children born of a concubinage were the equals of children born of the marriage. A concubine had a legal claim to her consort’s estate secondary to a wife’s claim. Concubines could not testify against their consorts in criminal matters.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Millett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership