Sugarland Ind., Inc. v. Thomas

420 A.2d 142 (1980)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sugarland Ind., Inc. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Delaware
420 A.2d 142 (1980)

SC

Facts

The board of directors of Sugarland Industries, Inc. (Sugarland) (defendant) was in the process of selling a tract of land (south tract) to White and Hill for $23.8 million. Certain Sugarland shareholders (plaintiffs) hired an attorney to represent their interests, because they thought the price was inadequate. On account of the plaintiffs’ and their attorney’s work, another company, R-S-C, offered the Sugarland board $27 million for the south tract. When the board continued to prefer the White and Hill offer, the plaintiffs brought a shareholder derivative suit in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The trial court ordered that the Sugarland board consider competitive bids for the south tract. Sugarland did so and ended up selling the south tract to Hines for $37.2 million. In addition, in a second sealed bidding process, Hines bid $1.25 million more than the next highest bidder for another parcel of Sugarland property (north tract). The trial court awarded the plaintiffs’ attorney a fee equal to 20 percent of the difference between the amount paid by Hines and the initial White and Hill offer. Sugarland appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duffy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership