Sullivan v. Bullock
Idaho Court of Appeals
864 P.2d 184 (1993)
In April 1991, Cora Sullivan (Sullivan) (plaintiff) hired Dallas Bullock (Bullock) (defendant) to remodel Sullivan’s home. During construction, Sullivan stated that Bullock and Bullock’s workers were not to enter Sullivan’s home on a particular day. However, one of Bullock’s workers entered Sullivan’s home. Upon finding out, Sullivan told Bullock that Bullock was no longer allowed to enter Sullivan’s home. Bullock repeatedly requested that Sullivan allow Bullock to enter Sullivan’s home to complete the project and Sullivan refused. Bullock sent Sullivan the bill for the work completed and Sullivan refused to pay. Sullivan sued stating that Bullock’s work was defective. Bullock argued that Bullock could have remedied any defects, but was prevented from doing so by Sullivan. At trial, the jury returned a special verdict for Bullock. Sullivan appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Walters, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 708,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 708,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.