Summers v. Garland
Arkansas Supreme Court
98 S.W.3d 23 (2003)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The will of William Otis Garland established a $100,000 trust, the terms of which provided that Richard Garland (defendant) was entitled to use the interest generated by the trust property until he was 30 years old. The terms further provided that, if Garland either died or was convicted of a felony before turning 30, the corpus of the trust would be divided equally between Donna Garland Summers (plaintiff) and Ruby Jo Garland Warren. In December 1993, prior to his 30th birthday, Garland pleaded guilty to a felony. Days after his 30th birthday in August 2000, Garland petitioned the court for the dismissal of the felony charge and the sealing of all related case records. The judge granted the petition on the basis that Garland had complied with the terms of his probation. Thereafter, Garland and Summers both made demands for the trust property. The trustee filed an interpleader complaint to determine entitlement. The trial court concluded that Summers was precluded from presenting evidence of Garland’s conviction as proof that he violated the trust terms because the felony charge had been dismissed. Summers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thornton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.