Summers v. WellTech

935 S.W.2d 228 (1996)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Summers v. WellTech

Texas Court of Appeals
935 S.W.2d 228 (1996)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1991, three individuals (collectively, the control persons) (defendants) formed Vanguard Environmental, Inc. (Vanguard). Vanguard’s key asset was the TDS-10, a machine designed to measure soil contamination. Seeking investors, the control persons began negotiating with the president of WellTech, Inc. (plaintiff). WellTech agreed to a deal in which it would buy 50 percent of Vanguard’s stock for $1.25 million. Prior to the deal’s closing, Vanguard’s management discovered that one of the control persons had diverted $376,000 of the company’s funds to himself and was the subject of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) investigation. No one informed WellTech of the diverted funds or the EPA investigation. Vanguard also misrepresented the capacity of the TDS-10 and overstated Vanguard’s assets by $250,000. WellTech did not become aware of any of the misstated or concealed information until after the deal closed. WellTech sued the control persons, alleging fraud under a state securities law and seeking rescission of the sale. The trial court entered judgment for WellTech, ordering rescission. The control persons appealed, raising various points of error, including that WellTech might have discovered the facts about Vanguard through the exercise of due diligence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taft, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership