Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Sunkidd Venture, Inc. v. Snyder-Entel

Court of Appeals of Washington
941 P.2d 16 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997)


Facts

William Entel and Shannon Snyder-Entel (defendant) were married. William and Shannon lived together in an apartment. In August 1988, the apartment’s management company sent William and Shannon a letter, indicating that the lease was ending and offering a chance to renew the lease. William signed a one-year extension of the lease. Shannon had not signed the original lease and did not sign the lease extension. In October 1988, Shannon sent a letter to the management company, stating that she and William intended to vacate the apartment by the end of the month. In response, the management company sent William an invoice for the remaining rent due under the lease. William did not pay the invoice. The management company assigned the debt to Sunkidd Venture, Inc. (Sunkidd) (plaintiff). In May 1991, Sunkidd brought suit against Shannon individually to recover the unpaid rent. Shannon and William divorced in April 1993. In June 1994, Shannon responded to Sunkidd’s complaint, arguing that she was not liable for the debt. The district court agreed with Shannon and dismissed Sunkidd’s complaint. The Spokane County Superior Court affirmed. Sunkidd appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Schultheis, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Thompson, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.