Sunnyvale Medical Clinic

277 N.L.R.B. 1217 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sunnyvale Medical Clinic

National Labor Relations Board
277 N.L.R.B. 1217 (1985)

Facts

Two employees of Sunnyvale Medical Clinic (Sunnyvale) (defendant), Tracie Rothweiler and Pam Gardner, went to the office of Sunnyvale’s personnel director, Sandra Easterly, to take care of personal matters. As Rothweiler and Gardner were leaving, Easterly asked Rothweiler to stay behind and closed the door. Easterly asked why Rothweiler had joined the union and why the employees had not come to Easterly if they had complaints. Rothweiler responded that they had tried but nothing had been done. Rothweiler was a union member, which she had not hidden from Rothweiler, but she was not an open or active union supporter. In addition, Rothweiler later described the conversation as friendly and casual. The union (plaintiff) filed a charge against Sunnyvale for illegally interrogating Rothweiler. The judge dismissed the charge. The judge applied the totality-of-the-circumstances test from Rossmore House, 269 N.L.R.B. 1176 (1984), and found that Easterly was not attempting to gather information with the purpose of using it to take adverse action against employees. The union sought review of the judge’s findings by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Information not provided in casebook excerpt.)

Dissent (Dennis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership