Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. R.J. Sanders, Inc.

711 A.2d 628 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. R.J. Sanders, Inc.

Rhode Island Supreme Court
711 A.2d 628 (1998)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

R. J. Sanders, Inc. (Sanders) (defendant) contracted with the federal government to construct a prison facility. Sanders sent specifications for boilers to Superior Boiler Works, Inc. (Superior) (plaintiff), a manufacturer of commercial boilers. In March 1990, Superior responded by issuing a proposal with specifications for a Seminole boiler and indicating a delivery time of four weeks, with the qualification that the specified time of delivery was approximate, a best estimate, and subject to causes of delay outside Superior’s control. Superior’s agent, Atkinson & Lawrence Inc. (Atkinson), wrote to Sanders assuring a delivery date within three to four weeks. Superior then issued a second proposal with the same estimated time frame for delivery, albeit with the same caveat as the first proposal. On June 18, Sanders issued a purchase order for three Seminole boilers. On June 25, Atkinson wrote to Superior, explaining that Sanders wanted to substitute industrial combustion burners for the burners originally specified. On June 29, Sanders issued a second purchase order requesting that Superior make the requested change. This purchase order noted Sanders’s expectation of a four-week delivery time. Three weeks later, Sanders received a signed copy of this purchase order. On July 20, the government engineers gave their final approval for the specifications, and Sanders issued its final purchase order. On August 6, 1990, Superior issued a sales order reflecting all of the changes. This sales order indicated a shipping date of October 1, 1990. Gregory Call, Superior’s national sales manager, stated that the longer time frame was due to a seasonal influx of boiler orders that arose during the whole process. Call stated that because of this, Superior could no longer adhere to the four-week delivery time frame. Unable to delay the construction project, Sanders rented boilers, resulting in a large cost. Sanders subtracted this cost when tendering payment to Superior for the boilers. Superior filed a suit, seeking the unpaid balance. Superior filed a motion for summary judgment. A superior court granted the motion. Sanders appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flanders, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership