Superior Vision Services, Inc. v. ReliaStar Life Insurance Company
Delaware Court of Chancery
2006 WL 2521426 (2006)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Pursuant to a number of stock purchase agreements, Superior Vision Services, Inc. (SVS) (plaintiff), a privately held corporation, issued shares to its investors, including ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (defendant), a holder of 44 percent of SVS’s stock. The agreements prohibited dividend payments, but provided for waiver of the prohibition with consent of at least two-thirds of the interests of the purchased securities. Because of ReliaStar’s 44-percent ownership interest, waiver could only occur with ReliaStar’s consent. The SVS board considered and approved a policy for payment of dividends. ReliaStar, however, withheld its consent to implement the policy. SVS petitioned the court for a declaration that ReliaStar breached its fiduciary duties to SVS by refusing to consent to payment of dividends. ReliaStar moved to dismiss the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Noble, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.