Surasky v. United States

325 F.2d 191 (1963)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Surasky v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
325 F.2d 191 (1963)

SR

Facts

Surasky (plaintiff) purchased 4,000 shares of Montgomery Ward & Co. at the advice of Louis E. Wolfson, a substantial shareholder in the company. Wolfson developed an elaborate plan that he believed would improve the company and result in an increase in its stock value. The plan included such objectives as electing a new board of directors, introducing new management, and ultimately achieving an increase in dividends. Wolfson, together with Surasky and other stockholders, established a committee to implement the plan. In 1955, Surasky contributed $17,000 to the committee in the hopes of generating more income from his investment. The committee managed to achieve some of its stated goals. Three of the nine board members were replaced and two original members of management resigned. Furthermore, the company enjoyed an increase in dividends in the latter half of the year. Surasky deducted the $17,000 expenditure as an ordinary and necessary non-business expense. The district court ruled that Surasky was not entitled to the deduction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tuttle, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership