Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Supreme Court of Ohio
696 N.E.2d 187 (1998)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Sutowski (plaintiff) was prescribed DES, a synthetic estrogen. More than 200 companies manufactured DES before it was found to be harmful to patients. Sutowski, who had already ingested DES, brought a products-liability suit in federal district court against Eli Lilly & Company (Eli) (defendant), one of the manufacturers of DES. Because Sutowski could not prove that Eli was the manufacturer of the specific version of DES that she ingested, Sutowski based her suit on the market-share theory of liability. This theory had been instituted in DES cases in some states to prevent innocent victims from bearing the cost of injury when there was no way to prove the identity of the specific manufacturer. The district court certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio the question of whether market-share liability existed in Ohio.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cook, J.)
Dissent (Pfeiffer, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.