Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
United States Supreme Court
402 U.S. 1 (1971)
After the Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), the state of North Carolina applied the decision by ending segregation through a school assignment plan based on neighborhoods approved by the Court. However, when Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (defendant) consolidated school districts from the city itself and within its surrounding areas, the practical effect was that the majority of African American children still attended segregated schools because of the geographic location of their residences. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) brought suit in federal district court on behalf of Swann (plaintiff), an African American school-age child, challenging continued segregation by the Board and seeking a judgment from the court that busing of students to different school districts was required for desegregation. The district court agreed with Swann, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 161,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.