Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Swanson v. Krenik

868 P. 297 (1994)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Swanson v. Krenik

Alaska Supreme Court

868 P. 297 (1994)

Facts

In 1977, Thomas and Leila Krenik (defendants) executed a deed of trust to secure a bank's loan of money for the purchase of real property. In 1981, the Kreniks sold the property to Marie Swanson (plaintiff), who assumed the Kreniks' loan and gave them a second deed of trust on the property. In 1983, Swanson sold the property to Ray Rush and Howard Luther, Jr., who also assumed the Kreniks' loan, and who gave Swanson a third deed of trust on the property. The 1983 sale contract stipulated that the Kreniks, Swanson, Rush, and Luther were jointly and severally bound to repay the bank's loan, but the contract also stated that it did not change the then-existing relative liability of the Kreniks and Swanson. In 1986, Rush and Luther defaulted on the loan, and in 1988, the bank initiated foreclosure proceedings against the Kreniks, Swanson, Rush, and Luther. The trial court permitted the bank to foreclose on the property, but the property sold for less than the loan amount, leaving the bank with a $1,173,992 deficiency. Rush and Luther had declared bankruptcy in 1989, so they could not make up this deficiency. Swanson counterclaimed against the Kreniks, contending that they were her co-sureties on the loan and therefore shared her liability for any deficiency judgment in favor of the bank. The court ruled for the Kreniks, and Swanson appealed to the Alaska Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership