Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sweatt v. Painter

339 U.S. 629 (1950)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Sweatt v. Painter

United States Supreme Court

339 U.S. 629 (1950)

Play video

Facts

Sweatt (plaintiff), a black person, applied for admission to the prestigious University of Texas Law School, a state institution amply endowed with faculty and other resources. The university admitted only whites, so Painter and other Texas officials (defendants) rejected Sweatt's application on racial grounds. However, the state's blacks-only law school offered to admit Sweatt. Sweatt sued for admission to the university, arguing his rejection on racial grounds violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial judge ruled that the Equal Protection Clause required only that Texas provide Sweatt with a legal education comparable to what the university provided. Sweatt appealed to the Texas Court of Civil Appeals, which held that, before dismissing Sweatt's case, the trial judge had to determine if the university and the blacks-only law school offered comparable educational opportunities. On remand, the judge found that the opportunities were comparable and dismissed Sweatt's case. Both the appellate court and the Texas Supreme Court affirmed the judge's ruling. The United States Supreme Court granted Sweatt's petition for certiorari and heard arguments for and against overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537 (1896), which held that official racial segregation was legal if the government provided similar facilities for blacks and whites.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vinson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership