Swenson v. Sullivan

876 F.2d 683 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Swenson v. Sullivan

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
876 F.2d 683 (1989)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

Herman W. Swenson (plaintiff) was denied Social Security disability benefits based on an administrative-law judge’s (ALJ) finding that significant numbers of routine, low stress, and unskilled jobs existed that Swenson could still perform with his impairments. At the ALJ hearing, a vocational expert testified that, based on an examining physician’s report of Swenson’s impairments, Swenson could perform fewer jobs than someone three years older could perform if that person was deemed disabled according to the grid tables located in the Social Security Administration’s medical-vocational guidelines (the grids). The expert concluded that there were several thousand jobs in Swenson’s state that he could perform given his limitations. The ALJ based his decision on the expert’s testimony without providing reasons for doing so. The ALJ’s decision became the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Louis Sullivan (defendant). Swenson’s wife sought judicial review of the denial, posthumously, and a district court granted summary judgment in favor of the secretary. Swenson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership