Swiezynski v. Civiello

489 A.2d 634 (1985)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Swiezynski v. Civiello

New Hampshire Supreme Court
489 A.2d 634 (1985)

Facts

Margaret Swiezynski (plaintiff) was a grocery-store clerk at the Garden Street Superette, owned and operated by Rocco Civiello and William Crawford (defendants) as a partnership. The grocery store was located in a building owned by Civiello and Crawford individually as tenants in common. Swiezynski was injured in the store and started to receive workers’-compensation benefits for her injuries. Swiezynski filed a case against Civiello and Crawford, individually as the landowners, arguing that they breached their duty of care owed to her, causing her injury. Swiezynski argued that her negligence claim should be permissible because Civiello and Crawford owned the grocery store as tenants in common and not in the name of the partnership, meaning the workers’-compensation bar was inapplicable. The court, without reviewing the partnership agreement, dismissed Swiezynski’s action, finding that Civiello and Crawford could not be liable because they were employers within the meaning of the workers’-compensation statute. Swiezynski appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Batchelder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership