Swint v. Chambers County Commission

514 U.S. 35 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Swint v. Chambers County Commission

United States Supreme Court
514 U.S. 35 (1995)

Facts

Police raided a nightclub in Chambers County, Alabama. The nightclub’s owners, among others (plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit against the Chambers County Commission, the city, and police officers involved in the raid (defendants), alleging civil-rights violations. The police officers filed motions for summary judgment, arguing that they were entitled to qualified immunity. The trial court denied the police officers’ motion. The trial court also denied the county commission’s motion for summary judgment, leaving the county potentially liable. The trial court specifically stated that it would rule on the county’s liability closer to trial. The police officers appealed from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, which is an allowable interlocutory appeal. The county commission appealed as well, alleging that the denial of its summary-judgment motion should be immediately appealable based on pendent appellate jurisdiction. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit accepted jurisdiction of the county commission’s appeal based on pendent appellate jurisdiction and ruled that the county commission was entitled to summary judgment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership