Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
311 Mass. 677, 42 N.E.2d 808 (1942)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Swinton (plaintiff) purchased a house from Whitinsville Savings Bank (Whitinsville) (defendant) where he lived with his family. Almost two years later, Swinton discovered that the house was infested with termites and had been at the time of the sale. Swinton could not observe the infestation when he purchased the home, but Whitinsville was aware of the infestation and failed to inform Swinton of the house’s condition. Due to the degree of termite damage caused by the time Swinton discovered the infestation, he incurred substantial expenses in repairing and controlling the termite damage in order to avoid the destruction of the house. Swinton sued Whitinsville for falsely and fraudulently concealing the condition of the house at the time of the sale. The trial court dismissed Swinton’s complaint, and he appealed that decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Qua, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
