Syncom Industries, Inc. v. Wood

155 N.H. 73, 920 A.2d 1178 (2007)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Syncom Industries, Inc. v. Wood

New Hampshire Supreme Court
155 N.H. 73, 920 A.2d 1178 (2007)

JL
Play video

Facts

Eldon Wood (plaintiff) worked for Syncom Industries, Inc. (Syncom) (defendant) as the vice president of sales. Syncom provided cleaning and maintenance services for movie theaters. Wood was hired in 2001 based on his previous experience in the theater industry. Wood entered into an employment agreement with Syncom that contained a non-solicitation and non-compete agreement. William Hogan (plaintiff) also worked for Syncom and entered into a similar agreement. Hogan began working as an area manager and was promoted to regional manager. The agreement prohibited both employees from soliciting business from any of Syncom’s customers in any territory for three years after leaving Syncom. The agreement also prohibited both employees from working for or being associated with any company or person that might solicit business from any of Syncom’s customers. Wood and Hogan eventually left Syncom and founded a new company directly competing with Syncom. Wood and Hogan obtained the business of several of Syncom’s customers. Syncom sued Wood and Hogan for breach of the employment agreements. The trial court found the agreements to be enforceable and granted judgment to Syncom. Wood and Hogan appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Broderick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts
Cyberspace

Key Terms