From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson
United States Supreme Court
537 U.S. 28, 123 S. Ct. 366, 154 L. Ed. 2d 368 (2002)
Hurley Henson (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in Louisiana state court against Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (Syngenta) (defendant) for tort claims related to Syngenta’s sale of an allegedly harmful insecticide. Another lawsuit related to the insecticide, Price, was pending in federal court. Henson intervened in the Price suit and joined the settlement, which included a provision that all claims initiated against Syngenta by parties to the settlement had to be dismissed. After the Price suit was settled, the Louisiana state court held a hearing to determine whether Henson’s case should be dismissed and decided that the settlement only required certain claims against Syngenta be dismissed. Syngenta removed the case to federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), which allowed a defendant to remove a case from state court to federal court if the federal court had original jurisdiction over the case. Syngenta argued that the federal court had jurisdiction over the case through the All Writs Act, which allowed federal courts to issue writs in aid of their jurisdictions, and through supplemental jurisdiction. The case was transferred to the district court that oversaw the Price settlement, which then dismissed Henson’s case after finding that the case was barred by the Price settlement. Henson appealed. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s dismissal of Henson’s case, holding that the All Writs Act did not give the federal district court original jurisdiction over the case through which Syngenta could remove the case from state court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.