Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sztejn v. J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp.

Supreme Court of New York
31 N.Y.S.2d 631 (1941)


Facts

Sztejn (plaintiff) and Schwarz (defendant) entered into a contract with Transea Traders, Ltd. (Transea) (defendant), which was located in India, to purchase goods from Transea. Sztejn and Schwarz also contracted with J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation (Schroder) (defendant) for the issuance of an irrevocable letter of credit to Transea. The letter provided that drafts by Schroder for a portion of the purchase price would be paid by Schroder upon the shipment of the goods and the presentation of an invoice and bill of lading. Transea placed cases of material on a ship, procured a bill of lading from the shipping company, and obtained an invoice. However, the cases did not contain the contracted-for goods. Transea drew a draft under the letter of credit to the order of Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China (Chartered Bank) (defendant) and delivered the draft and documents to Chartered Bank. Chartered Bank presented the drafts and documents to Schroder for payment. Sztejn brought suit, seeking (1) a declaration that the letter of credit and the draft were void and (2) an injunction preventing the payment of the draft. The complaint alleged that Transea was engaged in a scheme to defraud Sztejn and Schwarz, that the merchandise shipped by Transea was in fact worthless rubbish, and that Chartered Bank was not an innocent holder of the draft for value but was instead attempting to procure payment of the draft for Transea. Chartered Bank moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Shientag, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.