T.C. Ziraat Bankasi v. Standard Chartered Bank

84 N.Y.2d 480, 644 N.E.2d 272, 619 N.Y.S.2d 690 (1994)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

T.C. Ziraat Bankasi v. Standard Chartered Bank

New York Court of Appeals
84 N.Y.2d 480, 644 N.E.2d 272, 619 N.Y.S.2d 690 (1994)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

Red Rock Commodities, Ltd. (Red Rock) sought to buy steel from a Swiss merchant and sell the steel to an Israeli merchant. Standard Chartered Bank (Standard) (defendant) agreed to make a loan to Red Rock for the steel purchase. At Red Rock’s request, Standard issued an irrevocable line-of-credit for $2,107,000 in favor of the Swiss seller. In return, the Swiss seller presented Standard with a negotiable bill of lading covering the shipment of 10,520.4 metric tons of steel billets on a vessel in Poland bound for Israel. Standard paid the Swiss seller with the money it had agreed to loan to Red Rock. Standard held the bill of lading while it awaited payment from the Israeli merchant, Ram Metals and Building Industries, Inc. (Ram Metals). To pay for the steel, Ram Metals took out a loan from Park Avenue Bank for $2.5 million. As security for this loan, T.C. Ziraat Bankasi (Ziraat) (plaintiff) issued a standby letter of credit in favor of Park Avenue Bank for $2.5 million. As security for the letter of credit, Standard endorsed and transferred the negotiable bill of lading for the steel to Ziraat. However, the bill of lading was fraudulent. The carrier never issued a bill of lading, and the steel billets did not exist. Thus, Ram Metals defaulted on its loan from Park Avenue Bank, and Ziraat was forced to pay out under the standby letter of credit. Ziraat sued Standard for breach of warranty. Standard claimed it was unaware of the fraud and was not responsible for the genuineness of the document as a mere intermediary. Standard moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted standard’s motion. Ziraat appealed, and the intermediate court of appeals affirmed. Ziraat appealed, and New York’s highest court of appeals granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership